Trump: A Setback For Trumpism
Read the original on Slate Star Codex →
Summary
A well-evidenced argument that Trump may have been a setback for his OWN causes. Scott assembles polls showing that around 2016, support for free trade, immigration (moral support, increasing numbers, opposition to deportation), belief in racial discrimination, and trust in mainstream media all spiked in the ANTI-Trumpist direction -- plus the cleanest case, Minkus/Deutschmann/Delhey (2018), where EU support jumped sharply right after Trump's election (a 'rally effect,' ~3 years of education's worth). He claims credit for predicting this in his anti-Trump endorsement (the left thrives imagining itself as rebels against a hateful authority, so 'bringing their straw man to life' pushes a generation left), then carefully distinguishes six candidate mechanisms (disgust-driven side-switching; Trumpist positions becoming untenable signals for Democrats; conservatives distancing to protect reputation; media focus shifting; goalpost-shifting; and the disruptive-protest research applied to Trump as a 'disruptive Republican move' producing unilateral polarization where Democrats move left but Republicans don't). The climate/guns spikes (not core-Trumpist) suggest a wider closing-of-ranks. Honest about cherry-picking risk, and lands on a real thesis: civility and honesty aren't always pointless own-goals -- if you're repulsive enough you damage your own cause.
Why this score
Quality 70 · Strong. Strong (70): a sharp, genuinely insightful backlash-effect thesis backed by real data (the poll spikes, the European rally-effect study) and a careful six-mechanism analysis, connecting to his civility/backlash and unilateral-polarization themes. Upper-Strong rather than Excellent because it's somewhat time-bound to 2018 and, by Scott's own admission, vulnerable to cherry-picking.
Claude’s paradigm shift 48 · Moderate. Moderate-to-Notable (48): the 'Trump as a setback for Trumpism' / backlash-rally framing and the unilateral-polarization mechanism are a fresh, non-obvious contribution, though they extend his existing backlash and Outgroup-era ideas.
Real-world impact 2 · Minor. A data-backed backlash-effect thesis about Trump; a contribution to political commentary that circulated within the discourse but moved no policy or material condition → RWI 2.