Scott Alexander, curated
← Back to curation

Bulls**t Jobs (Part 1 of ∞)

Quality
63
Strong
Claude Shift
42
Moderate
RWI
2
of 10

Summary

A short, sharp piece: the recurring dilemma of patients asking a psychiatrist for a back-pain doctor's note (lie, or refuse trivially-easy help), and Scott's 'radical honesty' note that just states what the patient told him and works anyway, because 'there is nobody... really invested in preventing Mr. Smith from bringing a chair into work' -- procedures degenerate into rituals so everyone looks procedural and responsible. Connects to Graeber's bullshit jobs and the question of how much of the economy is ritual make-work. Slight in scope but a genuine illumination of bureaucratic ritual.

Why this score

Quality 63 · Strong. Strong (63): a real, memorable insight (bureaucratic procedure-as-ritual that nobody actually cares about) delivered with economy; modest in scope and length, so lower-Strong.

Claude’s paradigm shift 42 · Moderate. Moderate (42): applies Graeber's bullshit-jobs frame to a vivid clinical case; little independent novelty.

Real-world impact 2 · Minor. Minor-plus (2): a widely-relatable observation within the blog's readership; no durable real-world effect.