Effects Of Vertical Acceleration On Wrongness
Read the original on Slate Star Codex →
Summary
A 76-word joke (complete, not truncated; self-tagged humor/short/statistics): whenever someone deploys the 'you wouldn't demand a double-blind placebo-controlled trial of PARACHUTES' anti-EBM trope, Scott wants to use them as the control group in his parachute experiment -- 'but deep down I know that would be morally wrong; groups need to be determined by random assignment.' A sharp one-liner riffing on a real evidence-based-medicine debate.
Why this score
Quality 48 · Solid. A clever throwaway, but a two-line joke with no substantive content. Solid-floor on quality.
Claude’s paradigm shift 20 · Slight. Slight. Riffs on a well-worn EBM trope; novelty is in the punchline only.
Real-world impact 1 · Negligible. A 76-word one-liner riffing on the parachute-RCT anti-EBM trope; a sharp throwaway joke with no substantive content or material-world reach → RWI 1.
Humor 2/5 · Man of One Study. A single sharp deadpan joke — volunteering evidence-based-medicine sneerers as the control group in a double-blind parachute trial ('Groups need to be determined by random assignment'); one solid laugh, very short → 2.