Ambijectivity

Coins 'ambijectivity' for the half-subjective/half-objective quality of statements like 'Mozart is better than Beethoven.' The move: such a statement is undefined over a set of component objective questions (and over which 'organ' — your music-appreciation faculty differs from mine) AND over how you weight those components — so the 'subjectivity' is really linguistic/definitional. But 'Mozart is better than the toddler upstairs' is NOT subjective, because the toddler loses on all/nearly-all components under any reasonable weighting. Same structure as 'is Pluto a planet?' (undefined over criteria) vs 'is my left foot a planet?' (no).

Quality 65 · Strong. Strong floor. A clean, memorable conceptual coinage that usefully dissolves subjective-vs-objective disputes (a cousin of his categories/disguised-queries thinking); the Pluto/left-foot and Mozart/toddler examples are sharp. Held at the Strong floor because it's short (1,116 words) and self-described as just wanting a quick word for the idea — a crisp tool, not a developed argument.

Claude’s paradigm shift 52 · Moderate. Moderate (52). The 'ambijectivity' coinage and the 'subjectivity = variation + weighting of component objective questions' dissolution were a fresh, non-obvious conceptual move at publication, though built on standard rationalist conceptual-analysis.

Real-world impact 1 · Negligible. Negligible (1). The coinage didn't propagate the way his bigger ones did; a niche conceptual point with little reach beyond the blog.