Approving reinforces low-effort behaviors
Read the original on LessWrong →
Summary
Extends the wanting/liking framework with a third axis, 'approving' (ego-syntonic thoughts), yielding a 2x2x2 grid (e.g. heroin = +want/+like/-approve; disc golf = +want/-like/+approve; soup kitchen = -want/-like/+approve). Goals are approving-thoughts. The key mechanism: ego-syntonicity reliably reinforces only LOW-effort behaviors (speaking, forming a public goal), while high-effort behaviors are subject to akrasia — so you can use cheap, effortless approving-actions to shape the hard road ahead (announce a goal so failing would embarrass you; freeze your credit card in ice; use stickk). 'The mind using mind's opinion of the mind to blackmail the mind.' Transhumanist coda: push-button self-modification would be the ultimate triumph of the ego-syntonic faction, since it would be reinforced purely by approval.
Why this score
Quality 75 · Excellent. Strong. A useful, clever extension of his wanting/liking model that gives a real account of why commitment devices work (low-effort reinforcement bridging to high-effort goals). Held at 75 by being a brief follow-up within the sequence. 75.
Claude’s paradigm shift 50 · Moderate. Moderate. Adds the 'approving' axis to his own framework and draws a fresh akrasia-management implication; a moderate extension rather than a new concept. 50.
Real-world impact 2 · Minor. A clever extension of the wanting/liking model with a third 'approving' axis that gives a real account of why commitment devices work (cheap low-effort approving-actions reinforce the hard road ahead). Conceptual influence within rationalist discourse, no material change — low RWI.