Physical and Mental Behavior
Read the original on LessWrong →
Summary
A behaviorist account of akrasia. Building on Skinner's 'mental behavior,' thoughts and intentions are reinforced internally (a pleasant thought prospers, an unpleasant one dies out). The Swahili daydream illustrates it: thinking-about and intending-to learn Swahili are pleasant and so positively reinforced, while actually studying is unpleasant, sparsely rewarded, and steeply time-discounted (Ainslie), so negatively reinforced at every opportunity. The crucial error is expecting reinforcement of a thought to correspond to reinforcement of its object — there is no built-in link between the 'intend to study' node and the 'study' node; the connection is only learned the hard way, via the feeling-stupid feedback loop (which, overdone, makes you stop attempting anything difficult). Clean, vivid, self-contained; cites Roko's Ugh Fields.
Why this score
Quality 74 · Strong. Strong-tier. A memorable, useful mechanism for the universal intend-but-don't-do pattern, well illustrated by the Swahili fantasy. But a short single-point post applying Skinner/Ainslie/Roko rather than a field-defining contribution; sits below the foundational LW classics (77–80).
Claude’s paradigm shift 46 · Moderate. Notable-moderate novelty (2012). The akrasia substrate (Ugh Fields, hyperbolic discounting) pre-existed; the original move is the clean 'reinforcement of thoughts ≠ reinforcement of their objects' framing.
Real-world impact 2 · Minor. A memorable behaviorist mechanism for the universal intend-but-don't-do pattern (the Swahili daydream — reinforcement of a thought doesn't transfer to reinforcement of its object). Conceptual influence within rationalist discourse, a single-point application of Skinner/Ainslie, no material change — low RWI.