Scott Alexander, curated
← Back to curation

Revenge as Charitable Act

Quality
60
Strong
Claude Shift
48
Moderate
RWI
2
of 10

Summary

A concise contrarian argument that revenge against bad actors is a self-sacrificing public good - costly punishment that deters future bad behavior (crappy employers, rude customers) - which sits oddly with religions praising both self-sacrifice-for-community AND forgiveness. Notes the catch (people over-perceive slights). A sharp small application of the economics of costly punishment to everyday ethics.

Why this score

Quality 60 · Strong. Strong (low): a crisp, counterintuitive idea cleanly made, but slight (~675 words) and one-note. ~60.

Claude’s paradigm shift 48 · Moderate. Applies the existing economics of costly punishment/deterrence to personal revenge - a fresh framing, not a new idea. ~48.

Real-world impact 2 · Minor. A crisp contrarian application of the economics of costly punishment to everyday revenge; a small, one-note idea within the discourse, no material-world reach → RWI 2.