Why Is The Academic Job Market So Weird?
Read the original on Astral Codex Ten →
Follow-up reading
↳ Highlights From The Comments On The Academic Job Market — Highlights (companion) · Jun 2023
Summary
Short economic reframe (responding to Bret Devereaux) of the tenure/adjunct split: colleges buy two different products under one job title - cheap 'warm body' teaching (a status-glutted labor market, so cheap) and expensive prestige/research superstars (a bidding war, so expensive) - and blur them to fool students into thinking they're taught by the prestigious. But Scott openly trails off on why only inexperienced/outside hires get tenure-track, ending in a pile of unresolved puzzles.
Why this score
Quality 62 · Strong. A clean partial insight - the two-products-one-title supply/demand model of teaching-vs-prestige is a genuinely clarifying reframe ('greed isn't an answer') - but short (1.1k) and openly unresolved: Scott explicitly can't explain the inexperience/outside-hire pattern and ends with open questions (why not hire-everyone-and-poach?). Solid/Strong edge: real economic reasoning, half-answered.
Claude’s paradigm shift 44 · Moderate. Moderate-minus - a fresh application of standard labor-econ reasoning, a modest reframe rather than a new frame.
Real-world impact 2 · Minor. 2 - niche-discourse blog post; no material reach.