Scott Alexander, curated
← Back to curation

Model City Monday

Quality
62
Strong
Claude Shift
42
Moderate
RWI
2
of 10

Summary

The first Model City Monday — a roundup on charter cities, secessionist and utopian projects. The substantive core is the Charter Cities Institute vs Rethink Priorities cost-effectiveness debate: RP concludes charter cities probably won't beat GiveWell top charities on direct wellbeing (the closest analogue, Special Economic Zones, don't reliably outgrow their hosts per the World Bank), with a caveat for indirect 'laboratories of government' effects (Shenzhen → China's capitalism); Lutter's rebuttal that real charter cities are bigger/bolder than the studied SEZs. Plus the Free State Project / Free Society Project Europe (Montenegro), the Black Hammer 'Hammer City' reparations-MLM scam, the propertarian-vs-state-capacity governance split, and Scott's own Studwell-inflected 'could a charter city be Park Chung-Hee's Korea, not just Lee Kuan Yew's Singapore?' question. Meatier than the later Model City Mondays.

Why this score

Quality 62 · Strong. Strong/solid edge: above the roundup floor (58) for the genuine CCI/Rethink cost-effectiveness debate and the financial-hub-vs-large-scale-development distinction; still a curation-with-commentary linkpost.

Claude’s paradigm shift 42 · Moderate. Moderate: assembles and lightly synthesizes the charter-city cost-effectiveness debate; little novel of its own.

Real-world impact 2 · Minor. Within-discourse: shapes EA/charter-city thinking; no material reach.